Heating and cooling represent significant operational costs for building owners, particularly in commercial real estate. To effectively manage long-term expenses, selecting a mechanical system that aligns with your specific building requirements is crucial.
The market offers a diverse range of mechanical systems, each designed for different applications and environments. These include:
- Variable Air Volume (VAV) rooftop units
- Boiler/chiller systems
- Variant Refrigerant Flow (VRF) systems
- Air-source heat pumps
- Ground-source heat pumps
While some advanced systems involve higher upfront investments, they often deliver substantial returns through reduced energy consumption and lower maintenance costs. Collaborating with a mechanical engineer empowers your architect to conduct thorough life cycle cost analyses, guiding you to make informed decisions tailored to your needs.
It’s important to recognize that a universal mechanical system solution doesn’t exist. The most economically viable option is heavily influenced by your building’s size and intended use. This article will delve into five prevalent mechanical system types, highlighting where they are typically found and the key factors determining their efficiency.
Common Locations for Mechanical Systems and Their Types
1. Rooftop Units: Variable Air Volume (VAV) Systems
Variable Air Volume (VAV) systems are among the most conventionally used mechanical systems. You can commonly find VAV systems installed as self-contained units on the rooftops of commercial buildings and large residential complexes. These rooftop units are integrated with ductwork to draw in fresh air, condition it, and circulate it throughout the building’s interior spaces.
While primarily designed for cooling purposes, many modern rooftop VAV units also incorporate heating capabilities. In heating mode, the system directs air over gas-fired or electric coils to raise the temperature before distributing it via the ductwork.
VAV systems are often chosen for their lower initial installation cost. However, the overall long-term expenses are closely tied to the unit’s energy efficiency. Generally, investing in a higher-efficiency rooftop unit will mean a greater initial cost but promise better long-term savings.
Historically, VAV system heating components have relied on natural gas, which positions them as less sustainable compared to some alternatives. Electrification of these systems presents a pathway to decrease carbon footprint, although the overall efficiency gains from electrification will depend on factors like building characteristics and size.
2. Central Plant Rooms: Boiler/Chiller Systems
Boiler/chiller systems represent another frequently chosen option, particularly in expansive commercial and residential properties. These systems are typically located within a central plant room or mechanical room within the building. Boiler/chiller systems are hydronic, meaning they utilize water as the heat transfer medium instead of forced air. Water is circulated through pipes to air handlers throughout the building to either supply heat or remove it for cooling.
Generally, boiler/chiller systems offer enhanced efficiency compared to VAV systems. They also provide the advantage of supporting multiple thermal zones, allowing for simultaneous heating or cooling in different building areas with independent thermostat control. This zoning capability is a key reason why boiler/chiller systems are often found in larger buildings with diverse temperature control needs.
Despite their efficiency advantages and zoning capabilities, boiler/chiller systems usually entail a higher initial investment. Furthermore, many traditional boiler systems depend on natural gas, which contributes to increased carbon emissions, although modern electric boilers are becoming more prevalent.
3. Decentralized Locations: Variant Refrigerant Flow (VRF) Systems
Variant Refrigerant Flow (VRF) systems, as their name suggests, employ refrigerant for both heating and cooling processes. VRF systems are distinctive in that they distribute refrigerant through piping networks, a design innovation that increases efficiency compared to traditional forced air systems. While ductwork is still necessary to meet fresh air ventilation requirements, it’s significantly reduced in size, leading to lower fan energy consumption than VAV systems. VRF outdoor units can be placed on rooftops or ground level, while indoor units are located within the spaces they serve, offering decentralized climate control.
VRF systems are versatile and can be adapted to a wide array of building types, from large commercial complexes to smaller residential buildings. Their ability to provide heating and cooling with smaller ductwork makes them particularly well-suited for adaptive reuse projects and historic building renovations. For example, the Market One project in Des Moines incorporated a VRF system to meet the requirements for federal historic tax credit incentives, demonstrating their applicability in sensitive renovations.
VRF systems typically have a higher initial cost compared to VAV and boiler/chiller systems. However, their enhanced energy efficiency often translates to a significant return on investment through long-term energy savings. Additionally, VRF systems can operate without relying on natural gas or other fossil fuels, positioning them as a more environmentally sustainable choice.
types of mechanical systems3
VRF systems, chosen for projects like Market One, are often found in historic renovations due to their efficient and adaptable nature.
4. Exterior Walls or Grounds: Air-Source Heat Pumps
A heat pump is an energy-efficient device that transfers heat from one area to another using a minimal amount of energy. In heating mode, air-source heat pumps extract heat energy from the outside air and transfer it inside the building. This process is reversible, allowing for cooling by transferring heat from inside to outside. You can find air-source heat pump units mounted externally on building walls or placed on the ground adjacent to the building.
Heat pumps are recognized as some of the most efficient heating and cooling systems because they transfer heat rather than generating it through fuel combustion. This fundamental principle makes them significantly more energy-efficient than traditional combustion-based systems.
However, air-source heat pumps usually come with a higher initial purchase price and may not be suitable for all budgets. Moreover, air-source systems are most effective in climates with moderate temperature variations. In regions with extreme seasonal temperature swings, a supplemental heating system might be necessary, or exploring ground-source heat pumps could be a more appropriate solution.
5. Subsurface: Ground-Source Heat Pumps
Ground-source heat pumps operate on the same heat transfer principles as air-source systems but utilize geothermal energy. These systems leverage the earth’s consistent subsurface temperature to provide both heating and cooling for buildings throughout the year. The main components of ground-source heat pumps, including heat exchangers, are installed underground, utilizing the earth as a heat source in winter and a heat sink in summer.
Among the five mechanical systems discussed, ground-source heat pumps are among the most energy-efficient and environmentally friendly. However, they typically require more extensive on-site installation, including drilling and burying heat exchangers, which significantly increases the initial project cost. Geothermal energy projects are also often subject to regulations by local Departments of Natural Resources, necessitating a review of local restrictions before choosing this approach.
Factors Influencing Mechanical System Efficiency
Generally, mechanical systems with higher initial costs tend to result in lower life cycle costs and offer a greater return on investment over time. While air-source and ground-source heat pumps are recognized for their efficiency and sustainability, their overall effectiveness is contingent on factors like building size and intended use.
For instance, heat pump systems are well-suited for buildings where some temperature fluctuation is acceptable. However, facilities like laboratories or data centers that require consistent year-round cooling might present challenges for standard heat pump systems. In such cases, a heat pump system would necessitate a significantly larger ground loop or outdoor unit field, substantially increasing initial costs. In these scenarios, a VRF system might prove to be a more economically sound choice when considering life cycle and operational costs.
Occupancy patterns and thermal comfort requirements are also critical considerations. Some highly energy-efficient systems might struggle to maintain adequate cooling during periods of peak building occupancy.
Churches, as an example, experience significant fluctuations in occupancy. While occupancy is very high on Sundays, building usage is much lower during the week.
In these variable occupancy scenarios, a hybrid system approach might be the most effective. A ground-source heat pump could serve as the primary mechanical system during low-occupancy periods, and supplementary systems like VAV units could be activated to enhance cooling capacity during high-occupancy times like Sunday services.
In conclusion, energy efficiency is just one aspect to evaluate when selecting a mechanical system. Consulting with an experienced architect and mechanical engineer is essential to thoroughly assess your options and determine the most cost-effective and suitable mechanical system for your specific building needs.
types of mechanical systems2
Hybrid mechanical systems are often found in buildings like churches that experience significant variations in occupancy levels.
Additional Investments for Enhanced Building Performance
Selecting the right mechanical system is a pivotal decision in any building project. This choice will profoundly impact your operational budget and environmental footprint for many years. Although energy-efficient systems like heat pumps and VRF systems may require a larger initial investment, they are likely to yield a favorable return through substantial energy savings over the building’s lifespan.
The actual efficiency of any mechanical system is influenced by several factors, including building dimensions, its function, and the local climate conditions. Engaging your architect and engineer to analyze these factors and conduct comprehensive life cycle cost analyses is a critical step in the decision-making process.
Remember that the mechanical system is just one aspect of optimizing building performance. To explore further improvements, consider learning about seven investments that improve building performance.
